Narratives of Estrangement in Infrapolitics and in Lucrecia Martel's Cinema of Perception
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7264/peripherica.3.2.6076Keywords:
Estrangement, Silvia Schwarzböck, Cinema, Infrapolitics, Lucrecia Martel, Gareth Williams, Alberto MoreirasAbstract
This essay studies cinema and infrapolitics from the standpoint of estrangement as a narrative device that sets perception and politics in relationship to one another. It proposes that recent books on infrapolitics by Gareth Williams and Alberto Moreiras deconstruct prominent narratives of estrangement in which the processes of perceptual renewal catalyzed by art are ultimately understood in terms of their ulterior political significance, and elaborate alternate narratives in which estrangement instead makes perceptible, and marks the passage to, an in-eliminable strangeness at the heart of the relationship between politics and life. It then interprets Lucrecia Martel’s 2015 short film Leguas in terms of its interweaving of political and infrapolitical narratives of estrangement. It finally turns to a recent essay by Silvia Schwarzböck, titled Los monstruos más fríos: estética después del cine (2017), which narrates cinema history in terms of how twentieth-century cinema, by teaching viewers to identify with the cold, inhuman strangeness of the camera’s gaze, contributed to the increasing estrangement of human perception into the machinations of the modern state. Through its study of these materials, this essay argues that narratives of estrangement form an important standpoint for approaching the relationship between cinema and infrapolitics, due to the central significance of perceptual renewal–that is, the possibility of seeing things differently–to both the cinematic medium and infrapolitical reflection.
References
Amado, Ana. “Velocidades, generaciones y utopías: a propósito de La ciénaga, de Lucrecia Martel.” ALCEU, vol. 6, no. 12, 2006, pp. 48-56.
Amante, Adriana. “Martel Variations.” ReFocus: The Films of Lucrecia Martel, edited by Natalia Christofoletti Barrenha, Julia Kratje, and Paul R. Merchant, Edinburgh UP, 2022, pp. 138-59.
Boym, Svetlana. “Poetics and Politics of Estrangement: Victor Shklovsky and Hannah Arendt.” Poetics Today, vol. 26, no. 4, 2005, pp. 581-611.
Cerrato, Maddalena. “Autography and Infrapolitics.” Philosophy and Society, vol. 34, no. 1, 2023, pp. 76-97.
Eagleton, Terry. Literary Theory: An Introduction. U of Minnesota P, 1983.
Forcinito, Ana. “Being Unable to See and Being Invisible: Unrecognizable, Inaudible Voices in Fish, New Argirópolis and Muta.” ReFocus: The Films of Lucrecia Martel, edited by Natalia Christofoletti Barrenha, Julia Kratje, and Paul R. Merchant, Edinburgh UP, 2022, pp. 47-62.
Gemünden, Gerd. Lucrecia Martel. U of Illinois P, 2019.
Gómez, Leila. “El problema de la tierra en Lucrecia Martel.” Estéticas de la tierra en América Latina: Literatura, cine, arte, edited by Jörg Dünne and Jenny Haase, Iberoamericana/Vervuert, 2024, pp. 175-87.
Gómez-Barris, Macarena. The Extractive Zone: Social Ecologies and Decolonial Perspectives. Duke UP, 2017.
Hoyos, Héctor. Things with a History: Transcultural Materialism and the Literatures of Extraction in Contemporary Latin America. Columbia UP, 2019.
Jameson, Fredric. The Prison-House of Language. Princeton UP, 1972.
Jagoe, Eva-Lynn and John Cant. “Vibraciones encarnadas en La niña santa de Lucrecia Martel.” El cine argentino de hoy: Entre el arte y la política. Ed. Victoria Rangil. Buenos Aires: Editorial Biblos, 2007. 169-90.
Leguas. Dir. Lucrecia Martel. Argentina, 2015. Dist. Canana Films.
Martel, Lucrecia. “Para mí el cine es un lugar de percepción.” Interview by Jorge García and Eduardo Rojas. El Amante 195 (2008): 8-10.
Martin, Deborah. The Cinema of Lucrecia Martel. Manchester UP, 2016.
Moreiras, Alberto. Infrapolitics: A Handbook. Fordham UP, 2021.
---. Uncanny Rest: For Antiphilosophy. Duke UP, 2022.
Oubiña, David. Estudio crítico sobre La ciénaga. Buenos Aires: Picnic Editorial, 2007.
Rancière, Jacques. “The Aesthetic Revolution and Its Outcomes: Emplotments of Autonomy and Heteronomy.” New Left Review, no. 14, 2002, pp. 133-51.
Rodríguez Matos, Jaime. “Infrapolitics at the End of Aesth-Ethics: On Alberto Moreiras’ Recent Work.” Philosophy and Society, vol. 34, no. 1, 2023, pp. 98-119.
Schwarzböck, Silvia. Los espantos: estética y postdictadura. Cuarenta Ríos, 2015.
---. Los monstruos más fríos: estética después del cine. Mardulce, 2017.
Schwarzböck, Silvia, and Hugo Salas. “El verano de nuestro descontento: género y violencia en La ciénaga.” El Amante, no. 108, 2001, pp. 10-13.
Shklovsky, Viktor. “Art, as Device.” Translated by Alexandra Berlina, Poetics Today, vol. 36, no. 3, 2015, pp. 151-174.
Stiegler, Bernard. The Age of Disruption: Technology and Madness in Computational Capitalism. Polity, 2019.
Vilarós, Teresa. “La piel de la tierra.” Culture Machine, vol. 22, 2023, pp. 1-18.
Villacañas, José Luis. Neoliberalismo como teología política: Habermas, Foucault, Dardot, Laval y la historia del capitalismo contemporáneo. Ned Ediciones, 2020.
Williams, Gareth. “Anthropocene, Infrapolitics, and Epochal Anxiety: Upon Reading Samanta Schweblin’s Kentukis and Distancia de rescate.” Culture Machine, vol. 22, 2023, pp. 1-38.
---. Infrapolitical Passages: Global Turmoil, Narco-Accumulation, and the Post-Sovereign State. Fordham UP, 2021.
---. “The Insistence That Is Posthegemony: Negativity, Technique, and the Question of Alienation.” Res Publica: Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas, vol. 25, no. 3, 2022, pp. 391-407.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Periphērica: Journal of Social, Cultural, and Literary History

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
