A Way of Comparing Levi-Strauss and Lacan

Authors

  • Yvan Simonis Université de Laval, Emeritus, Anthropology, and psychoanalyst, GIFRIC

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5399/uo/konturen.3.1.1406

Abstract

This essay attempts to compare and contrast the different conceptions of the human subject in Claude Lévi-Strauss and Jacques Lacan, with specific reference to the notions of art and the act. For this occasion I will draw on my reading of structuralism, developed elsewhere, as a “logic of the aesthetic perception of the social.” Structuralism apparently distances itself from the act, but it presupposes the act as a foundation. Psychoanalysis takes the act as its point of departure and seeks its art. In each case, the human subject is conceived differently. Nonetheless, the exercise appended to this essay proposes a space in which these two approaches can perhaps encounter each other on the common ground of structure.

Author Biography

  • Yvan Simonis, Université de Laval, Emeritus, Anthropology, and psychoanalyst, GIFRIC
    Yvan Simonis received his PhD in Paris in 1967, and is currently a teaching analyst of GIFRIC and an analyst of Freudian School of Québec (EFQ). He is an anthropologist and has been chairman of the Laval University’s Department of Anthropology (1976-1979), and in 1977 he founded the journal Anthropologie et Sociétés, acting as editor-in-chief from 1977 to 1988. He became a member of GIFRIC in 1995 and retired in 1999.

Downloads

Published

2010-12-28

How to Cite